This new image of this unexplained ancient Peruvian stonework prompts me to finally comment on it in light of my recent exposition titled; Anti-Gravity Technology in Ancient Egypt. It fits the pattern identified in that examination of inexplicable damage to stonework in Egypt. It also is in a chaotic condition, as though upside down and sideways, and horribly damaged.
The question that confronts the curious is: how could such a massive object been broken in pieces when it is so thick and so heavy? The answers that come naturally to mind are that it was either destroyed deliberately by human effort, or it was damaged by nature somehow. But neither possiblility can pass logical scrutiny.

First, if the damage was inflicted by humans then it had to have been via the use of dynamite… and a lot of it. But who could be blamed for such an attack? The only ready answer would be zealous Catholics seeking to irradicate paganism. But the problem with that is they engage in paganism themselves via the presense of numerous idols (statues), so if the structure had been a shrine for pagan idols then all they needed to do was remove the pagan statues and substitute their own. Problem solved. Blowing up a massive stone structure was not necessary since it was not a religious object itself, just a utilitarian stone object. So ascribing the damage to humans doesn't really work.
That leaves damage by nature, but that doesn't work either because it is not buried by some catastrophic landslide involving gigantic boulders that could smash just about anything. But if the original stone structure had its foundation collapse beneath it right on the edge of a cliff, then maybe it broke when tumbling downhill. But looking at the spread of the breakage that seems either unlikely or impossible because mere impact with the soil while rolling downhill could not crack such thick stone in such a deep and wide manner. It isn't a credible possibility because of the nature of the damage, which is not superficial.

So with those two possibilities being inconceivable, we are directed to the 'fantastical' and unmentioned 'third option'. It is the one that I proposed and explained in the anti-gravity post regarding ancient Egypt. It's logic is that such incredible damage across entire sections of huge stoneworks can only be explained as impact damage. Not impact with hammers and chisels but impact with hard ground.

That requires that anti-gravity be considered as the means to levitate even massive objects to a considerable height and then drop them. For that to have caused the damage probably required that the structure hit solid rock from a significant height since just soil alone could act as a cushion rather than an anvil.

So that's it. Such destruction can be seen in Peru and Egypt, which had much in common, and other places such as Baalbek which was badly destroyed before it was even originally finished. Work stopped at Baalbek, as it did at the Osirion, and the Serapeum, and who knows where else, as if some greater power than those ancient builders suddenly appeared and put an end to their unauthorized construction and colonization. It's as if the Prime Directive was violated.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Prime_Directive
The Prime Directive, also known as Starfleet General Order 1, the Non-Interference Directive, or the principle of non-interference, was the embodiment of one of Starfleet's most important ethical principles: noninterference with other cultures and civilizations. At its core was the philosophical concept that covered personnel should refrain from interfering in the natural, unassisted … natural development of alien civilizations.

So perhaps fiction imitated reality without even knowing it. Is there a better explanation for that damage?

[I'd give credit to the photographer but I don't know who took it.]

 This free site is ad-supported. Learn more
​