Standing Lincoln sculpture in Chicago's Lincoln Park
I was brought up to revere Abraham Lincoln as the Great Emancipator. But in recent years, I've read more and more claims that, in fact, he was just a white racist.
Last year some of the Black Lives Matter protestors toppled statues of people they considered symbols of American's racist past.
They didn't stop with Confederate generals, but went on to destroy statues of iconic American statesmen, up to and including Abraham Lincoln himself.
In Chicago, Mayor Lori Lightfoot appointed a Monuments Project advisory committee to evaluate the city's public statues, and the committee produced a list of 41 as possible candidates for removal.
The list includes five statues of Abraham Lincoln, as well as two of George Washington, one each of Benjamin Franklin and Ulysses S. Grant, and various French explorers, Civil War generals, generic Indians and other notables, plus plaques commemorating the first white settlers of the region.
The committee did not list Chicago's statue of Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln's great opponent on the issue of slavery, but it said it might recommend other statues for removal later on.
The Indictment
The case against Abraham Lincoln is as follows.
During his whole political career, he never was an abolitionist. In fact, he went out of his way to assure white Southerners that he had no intention of abolishing slavery where it was.
Instead he was a supporter of the Free Soil movement, which opposed adding new slave states to the Union. The Republican Party was founded to support Free Soil
Some Free Soilers were abolitionists, but others were outright white racists and many didn't care oneway or the other about slavery in the South. Their objection was to free workers having to compete with slave labor.
Lincoln in many of his public statements despaired of white people and black people living together peaceably with equal rights.
Like many others of his day, he hoped that black Americans could emigrate to Liberia, a quasi-independent African nation established by the USA for that purpose.
Once elected President, his priority was to save the Union, not to abolish slavery.
He only issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862 when the Confederacy seemed about to win recognition from Britain and France, as a means of rallying progressive world opinion to the Union side.
Even then, the proclamation only applied to areas under control of the Confederacy. It freed not one slave in Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri or any other area under Union control.
The defense
Opposition to the spread of slavery was a big deal. Both opponents and defenders of slavery believed that, without new territory for slave-worked plantation agriculture, slavery would die out in the USA.
That's why, after Lincoln's election, seven Southern states declared their independence before he was even inaugurated.
He did not try to entice these states back into the Union through compromise. Instead he asserted federal authority by ordering the resupply of Fort Sumter in the harbor of Charleston, S.C.
His priority was to save the Union. If the Union had not been preserved, there would have been no possibility of abolishing slavery.
Read more of this post
No comments:
Post a Comment